Who is better, Kosgei or Edwards?
Brigid Kosgei leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Jonathan Edwards — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Brigid Kosgei above Jonathan Edwards: 87.5 vs 87.4. Brigid Kosgei leads on Dominance, Peak. Jonathan Edwards leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kosgei wins: Dominance, Peak
Edwards wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/brigid-kosgei-vs-jonathan-edwards
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kosgei leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇪 Kosgei | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 18 |
| 🇬🇧 Edwards | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71.14 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | KosgeiActive | EdwardsRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Marathon world record in hours | 2.14 | — |
| Marathon majors won | 5 | — |
| Olympic silver medals | 1 | — |
| London Marathon titles | 1 | — |
| Chicago Marathon titles | 2 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| World Championship golds | — | 2 |
| Triple jump world record (m) | — | 18.29 |
| European golds | — | 1 |
| Commonwealth golds | — | 1 |
| Jumps over 18 m | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 90 |
Brigid Kosgei leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.4 for Jonathan Edwards — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Edwards scores higher on honours, longevity. Kosgei leads on peak, dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Kosgei: 87.5, Edwards: 87.4.
Make your case for Kosgei vs Edwards. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.