Who is better, Anderson or Makau?
Patrick Makau leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.2 for Britany Anderson — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Patrick Makau above Britany Anderson: 78.6 vs 78.2. Patrick Makau leads on Dominance, Longevity. Britany Anderson leads on Statistics, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Makau wins: Dominance, Longevity
Anderson wins: Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/britany-anderson-vs-patrick-makau
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Makau leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇯🇲 Anderson | 0 | 0 | 12.9 | 25.61 | 62.92 | 100.57 |
| 🇰🇪 Makau | 0 | 0 | 72 | 154 | 338 | 690 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AndersonActive | MakauRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| World junior records | 1 | — |
| 100 m hurdles personal best | 12.31 | — |
| Diamond League wins | 2 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 1 | — |
| World record marathon | — | 2.034 |
| Berlin Marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Frankfurt Marathon wins | — | 1 |
| Sub 2:05 marathons | — | 4 |
| Half marathon best | — | 58.52 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 68 | 70 |
| Honours w20% | 76 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 82 |
Patrick Makau leads with a GOAT score of 78.6 against 78.2 for Britany Anderson — a gap of 0.4 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Anderson scores higher on honours, statistics. Makau leads on dominance, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anderson: 78.2, Makau: 78.6.
Make your case for Anderson vs Makau. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.