Who is better, Broken Blade or fnx?
Broken Blade leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.4 for Lincoln "fnx" Lau — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Broken Blade and Lincoln "fnx" Lau level at 81.4. Broken Blade leads on Dominance, Longevity, Statistics. Lincoln "fnx" Lau leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Broken Blade wins: Dominance, Longevity, Statistics
fnx wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/broken-blade-lol-vs-fnx-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Broken Blade leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇹🇷 Broken Blade | 0 | 0 | 55 | 117 | 345 | 685 |
| 🇧🇷 fnx | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 359 | 677 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Broken BladeActive | fnxRetired |
|---|---|---|
| LEC titles | 3 | — |
| Worlds appearances | 4 | — |
| MSI appearances | 2 | — |
| LEC finals | 5 | — |
| Career playoff series | 45 | — |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| Major finals | — | 2 |
| Big event titles | — | 8 |
| Major appearances | — | 8 |
| Professional seasons | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 86 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Broken Blade leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.4 for Lincoln "fnx" Lau — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
fnx scores higher on peak, honours. Broken Blade leads on dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Broken Blade: 81.4, fnx: 81.4.
Make your case for Broken Blade vs fnx. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.