Who is better, broky or Jimpphat?
broky leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Kaisa "Jimpphat" Sarkkinen — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks broky above Kaisa "Jimpphat" Sarkkinen: 82.1 vs 82.0. broky leads on Longevity, Honours. Kaisa "Jimpphat" Sarkkinen leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →broky wins: Longevity, Honours
Jimpphat wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/broky-vs-es-jimpphat
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
broky leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇱🇻 broky | 0 | 0 | 64 | 142 | 402 | 648 |
| 🇫🇮 Jimpphat | 0 | 0 | 55 | 123 | 392 | 480 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | brokyActive | JimpphatActive |
|---|---|---|
| Majors won | 1 | — |
| Intel Grand Slam titles | 1 | — |
| HLTV top-20 appearances | 4 | — |
| Big event titles | 12 | — |
| Big event MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Big tournament titles | — | 6 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 2 |
| Tournament MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Major playoff appearances | — | 2 |
| Seasons played | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 68 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
broky leads with a GOAT score of 82.1 against 82.0 for Kaisa "Jimpphat" Sarkkinen — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jimpphat scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. broky leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. broky: 82.1, Jimpphat: 82.0.
Make your case for broky vs Jimpphat. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.