Who is better, Barratt or Xu?
Bronte Barratt leads with a GOAT score of 81.4 against 81.4 for Xu Jiayu — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Barratt vs Xu
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bronte Barratt and Xu Jiayu level at 81.4. Bronte Barratt leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity. Xu Jiayu leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BarrattWinner
81.4Barratt wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Xu
81.4Xu wins: Dominance, Honours
Candidates
Locked to SwimmingShareable URL · /compare/bronte-barratt-vs-xu-jiayu
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Bronte Barratt
81.4
Barratt leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Bronte Barratt
2. Xu Jiayu
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇳 Xu Jiayu5 seasons played · career day 1,825370 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Bronte Barratt5 seasons played · career day 1,82518 major golds
-95.1% vs Xu at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Barratt | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 31 |
| 🇨🇳 Xu | 0 | 0 | 52 | 116 | 370 | 714 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Barratt81.4
Xu81.4
FAQ
Where does Xu beat Barratt?
Xu scores higher on dominance, honours. Barratt leads on peak, statistics, longevity.
How is the Barratt vs Xu score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Barratt: 81.4, Xu: 81.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Barratt vs Xu. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.