Who is better, Matthews or Graham?
Bruce Matthews leads with a GOAT score of 92.0 against 92.0 for Otto Graham — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bruce Matthews and Otto Graham level at 92.0. Bruce Matthews leads on Longevity, Statistics. Otto Graham leads on Honours, Dominance, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Matthews wins: Longevity, Statistics
Graham wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bruce-matthews-vs-otto-graham
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Matthews leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Matthews | 0 | 0 | 50 | 104 | 289 | 589 |
| 🇺🇸 Graham | 0 | 0 | 55 | 121 | 385 | 673 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | MatthewsRetired | GrahamRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pro Bowls | 14 | — |
| Games played | 296 | — |
| Seasons played | 19 | — |
| All-Pro selections | 7 | — |
| Line positions started | 5 | — |
| League titles | — | 7 |
| Championship games reached | — | 10 |
| Most Valuable Player awards | — | 5 |
| Passing yards | — | 23,584 |
| Career winning percentage | — | 81 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 94 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 98 |
| Longevity w20% | 98 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 96 | 94 |
Bruce Matthews leads with a GOAT score of 92.0 against 92.0 for Otto Graham — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Graham scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Matthews leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Matthews: 92.0, Graham: 92.0.
Make your case for Matthews vs Graham. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.