Who is better, McLaren or Hunt?
Bruce McLaren leads with a GOAT score of 73.9 against 73.9 for James Hunt — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
McLaren vs Hunt
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bruce McLaren and James Hunt level at 73.9. Bruce McLaren leads on Longevity. James Hunt leads on Peak, Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
McLarenWinner
73.9McLaren wins: Longevity
Hunt
73.9Hunt wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to Formula 1Shareable URL · /compare/bruce-mclaren-vs-james-hunt
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇳🇿 Bruce McLaren
73.9
McLaren leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Bruce McLaren
2. James Hunt
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇳🇿 Bruce McLaren5 seasons played · career day 2,190105 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 James Hunt5 seasons played · career day 1,82510 race wins
-90.5% vs McLaren at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 McLaren | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 88 | 131 |
| 🇬🇧 Hunt | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
McLaren73.9
Hunt73.9
FAQ
Where does Hunt beat McLaren?
Hunt scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. McLaren leads on longevity.
How is the McLaren vs Hunt score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McLaren: 73.9, Hunt: 73.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for McLaren vs Hunt. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.