Who is better, McLaren or R. Schumacher?
Bruce McLaren leads with a GOAT score of 73.9 against 73.8 for Ralf Schumacher — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bruce McLaren above Ralf Schumacher: 73.9 vs 73.8. Bruce McLaren leads on Honours, Dominance. Ralf Schumacher leads on Statistics, Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →McLaren wins: Dominance, Honours
R. Schumacher wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bruce-mclaren-vs-ralf-schumacher
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
McLaren leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇿 McLaren | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 88 | 131 |
| 🇩🇪 R. Schumacher | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 32 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | McLarenRetired | R. SchumacherRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Grand Prix wins | 4 | 6 |
| Podiums | 27 | 27 |
| Le Mans wins | 1 | — |
| Race starts | 100 | — |
| Best championship finish | 2 | 4 |
| Pole positions | — | 6 |
| Grand Prix starts | — | 180 |
| Dominance w25% | 70 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 80 | 82 |
| Longevity w20% | 74 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 66 |
| Statistics w15% | 72 | 80 |
Loading votes
Create a free account to vote and comment.
Sign in to voteBruce McLaren leads with a GOAT score of 73.9 against 73.8 for Ralf Schumacher — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
R. Schumacher scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. McLaren leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. McLaren: 73.9, R. Schumacher: 73.8.
Make your case for McLaren vs R. Schumacher. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.