Who is better, Smith or Hester?
Bruce Smith leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Devin Hester — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Bruce Smith and Devin Hester level at 87.5. Bruce Smith leads on Longevity, Statistics. Devin Hester leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Smith wins: Longevity, Statistics
Hester wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/bruce-smith-vs-devin-hester
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Smith leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Smith | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | 21.5 | 57.5 | 106 |
| 🇺🇸 Hester | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 16 | 20 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SmithRetired | HesterRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career sacks | 200 | — |
| Defensive Player of the Year | 2 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 11 | 4 |
| All-Pro First Teams | 8 | — |
| Super Bowl appearances | 4 | — |
| Forced fumbles | 43 | — |
| Return touchdowns | — | 20 |
| Punt return touchdowns | — | 14 |
| First-team All-Pro selections | — | 3 |
| Super Bowl kickoff return touchdowns | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 92 |
Bruce Smith leads with a GOAT score of 87.5 against 87.5 for Devin Hester — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hester scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Smith leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Smith: 87.5, Hester: 87.5.
Make your case for Smith vs Hester. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.