Who is better, Conti or Harder?
Bruno Conti leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.3 for Pernille Harder — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Conti wins: Peak, Longevity
Harder wins: Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/bruno-conti-vs-pernille-harder
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Conti leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Harder — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | ContiRetired | HarderActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 1 | — |
| Serie A titles | 1 | — |
| Coppa Italia | 5 | — |
| Italy caps | 37 | — |
| Roma Hall of Fame | 1 | — |
| UEFA Player of the Year awards | — | 2 |
| League titles | — | 8 |
| Denmark goals | — | 74 |
| Champions League goals | — | 40 |
| Career club goals | — | 250 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 85 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 75 | 84 |
Bruno Conti leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.3 for Pernille Harder — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Harder scores higher on statistics. Conti leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Conti: 82.4, Harder: 82.3.
Make your case for Conti vs Harder. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.