Who is better, Fratus or Cartwright?
Jack Cartwright leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.0 for Bruno Fratus — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jack Cartwright above Bruno Fratus: 79.1 vs 79.0. Jack Cartwright leads on Honours, Statistics. Bruno Fratus leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Cartwright wins: Honours, Statistics
Fratus wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/bruno-fratus-vs-jack-cartwright
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Cartwright leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Fratus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 🇦🇺 Cartwright | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 272 | 703 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FratusRetired | CartwrightActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic bronze medals | 1 | — |
| World Championship medals | 3 | 3 |
| Pan American golds | 2 | — |
| South American records | 4 | — |
| Olympic finals | 2 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | — | 1 |
| Commonwealth Games medals | — | 2 |
| Australian titles | — | 4 |
| Junior world titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 84 |
Jack Cartwright leads with a GOAT score of 79.1 against 79.0 for Bruno Fratus — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fratus scores higher on dominance, longevity. Cartwright leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fratus: 79.0, Cartwright: 79.1.
Make your case for Fratus vs Cartwright. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.