Who is better, Senna or Zhou?
Bruno Senna leads with a GOAT score of 64.3 against 62.7 for Zhou Guanyu — a gap of 1.6 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Senna vs Zhou
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Bruno Senna above Zhou Guanyu: 64.3 vs 62.7. Bruno Senna leads on Peak, Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
SennaWinner
64.3Senna wins: Peak, Longevity, Honours
Zhou
62.7Zhou wins: no category outright
Candidates
Locked to Formula 1Shareable URL · /compare/bruno-senna-vs-zhou-guanyu
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇧🇷 Bruno Senna
64.3
Senna leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Bruno Senna
2. Zhou Guanyu
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 3 · Form index per season1. 🇧🇷 Bruno Senna3 seasons played · career day 1,09533 race wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇳 Zhou Guanyu3 seasons played · career day 1,09516 race wins
-51.5% vs Senna at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Senna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 33 | 33 |
| 🇨🇳 Zhou | 0 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 16 | 16 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 3 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Senna64.3
Zhou62.7
FAQ
Where does Zhou beat Senna?
Zhou does not lead any of the five categories; Senna is ahead or level on all of them.
How is the Senna vs Zhou score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Senna: 64.3, Zhou: 62.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Senna vs Zhou. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.