Who is better, Trottier or Lafleur?
Guy Lafleur leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Bryan Trottier — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Trottier vs Lafleur
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Guy Lafleur above Bryan Trottier: 86.6 vs 86.5. Guy Lafleur leads on Dominance. Bryan Trottier leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
LafleurWinner
86.6Lafleur wins: Dominance
Trottier
86.5Trottier wins: Longevity
Candidates
Locked to Ice HockeyShareable URL · /compare/bryan-trottier-vs-guy-lafleur
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇨🇦 Guy Lafleur
86.6
Lafleur leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Guy Lafleur
2. Bryan Trottier
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇨🇦 Bryan Trottier5 seasons played · career day 1,825544 points
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇨🇦 Guy Lafleur5 seasons played · career day 1,825419 points
-23.0% vs Trottier at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Trottier | 0 | 0 | 95 | 200 | 544 | 977 |
| 🇨🇦 Lafleur | 0 | 0 | 64 | 119 | 419 | 941 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Lafleur86.6
Trottier86.5
FAQ
Where does Trottier beat Lafleur?
Trottier scores higher on longevity. Lafleur leads on dominance.
How is the Trottier vs Lafleur score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Trottier: 86.5, Lafleur: 86.6.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Trottier vs Lafleur. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.