Who is better, Bubka or Alekseyeva?
Sergey Bubka leads with a GOAT score of 93.2 against 18.9 for Tatyana Alekseyeva — a gap of 74.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Sergey Bubka above Tatyana Alekseyeva: 93.2 vs 18.9. Sergey Bubka leads on Dominance, Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bubka wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Honours, Statistics
Alekseyeva wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/bubka-vs-disc-tatyana-alekseyeva
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bubka leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Alekseyeva — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Alekseyeva — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BubkaRetired | AlekseyevaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World records | 35 | — |
| World golds (outdoor) | 6 | — |
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Best height (m) | 6.15 | — |
| 6.00m+ clearances | 44 | — |
| Seasons at the top | 18 | — |
| Dominance w25% | 96 | 18.8 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 20.8 |
| Longevity w20% | 92 | 16.8 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 19.8 |
| Statistics w15% | 93 | 17.8 |
Sergey Bubka leads with a GOAT score of 93.2 against 18.9 for Tatyana Alekseyeva — a gap of 74.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Alekseyeva does not lead any of the five categories; Bubka is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bubka: 93.2, Alekseyeva: 18.9.
Make your case for Bubka vs Alekseyeva. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.