Who is better, Jeannette or Cheeks?
Buddy Jeannette leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Maurice Cheeks — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Buddy Jeannette and Maurice Cheeks level at 84.6. Buddy Jeannette leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Maurice Cheeks leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Jeannette wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Cheeks wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/buddy-jeannette-vs-maurice-cheeks
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Jeannette leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Jeannette | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 38 | 80 |
| 🇺🇸 Cheeks | 0 | 0 | 8.4 | 19.8 | 54.4 | 108.9 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JeannetteRetired | CheeksRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NBL MVP awards | 4 | — |
| Championships | 5 | — |
| Seasons played | 12 | — |
| Career points per game | 9.3 | — |
| Hall of Fame inductions | 1 | — |
| NBA titles | — | 1 |
| All-Star selections | — | 4 |
| Career assists | — | 7,392 |
| Career steals | — | 2,310 |
| All-Defensive selections | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Buddy Jeannette leads with a GOAT score of 84.6 against 84.6 for Maurice Cheeks — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Cheeks scores higher on statistics, longevity. Jeannette leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Jeannette: 84.6, Cheeks: 84.6.
Make your case for Jeannette vs Cheeks. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.