Who is better, Buffon or Medalen?
Gianluigi Buffon leads with a GOAT score of 89.0 against 89.0 for Linda Medalen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Gianluigi Buffon and Linda Medalen level at 89.0. Gianluigi Buffon leads on Longevity. Linda Medalen leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Buffon wins: Longevity
Medalen wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/buffon-vs-linda-medalen-v
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Buffon leads in 1 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇮🇹 Buffon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 51 | 123 |
| 🇳🇴 Medalen | 0 | 0 | 55 | 115 | 325 | 675 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BuffonRetired | MedalenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cups | 1 | — |
| Serie A titles | 10 | — |
| Italy caps | 176 | — |
| Clean sheets | 500 | — |
| Yashin/Lev Yashin awards | 1 | — |
| Serie A appearances | 657 | — |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| Norway caps | — | 152 |
| Norway goals | — | 64 |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 93 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Gianluigi Buffon leads with a GOAT score of 89.0 against 89.0 for Linda Medalen — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Medalen scores higher on peak, dominance, honours, statistics. Buffon leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Buffon: 89.0, Medalen: 89.0.
Make your case for Buffon vs Medalen. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.