Who is better, Buffon or Courtois?
Thibaut Nicolas Marc Courtois leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.0 for Gianluigi Buffon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Thibaut Nicolas Marc Courtois above Gianluigi Buffon: 89.1 vs 89.0. Thibaut Nicolas Marc Courtois leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Gianluigi Buffon leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Courtois wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Buffon wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/buffon-vs-thibaut-courtois
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Courtois leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Buffon — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | BuffonRetired | CourtoisActive |
|---|---|---|
| World Cups | 1 | — |
| Serie A titles | 10 | — |
| Italy caps | 176 | — |
| Clean sheets | 500 | — |
| Yashin/Lev Yashin awards | 1 | — |
| Serie A appearances | 657 | — |
| League appearances | — | 479 |
| Belgium caps | — | 115 |
| Champions League titles | — | 2 |
| La Liga titles | — | 4 |
| Yashin Trophy | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 86 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 89 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 96 | 85 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Thibaut Nicolas Marc Courtois leads with a GOAT score of 89.1 against 89.0 for Gianluigi Buffon — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Buffon scores higher on longevity. Courtois leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Buffon: 89.0, Courtois: 89.1.
Make your case for Buffon vs Courtois. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.