Who is better, Cafu or Markgraf?
Kate Markgraf leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.6 for Cafu — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Cafu vs Markgraf
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Kate Markgraf above Cafu: 84.7 vs 84.6. Kate Markgraf leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics. Cafu leads on Longevity, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
MarkgrafWinner
84.7Markgraf wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Cafu
84.6Cafu wins: Dominance, Longevity
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Kate Markgraf
84.7
Markgraf leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Kate Markgraf
2. Cafu
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Kate Markgraf5 seasons played · career day 1,825317 goals
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇧🇷 Cafu5 seasons played · career day 2,19022 goals
-93.1% vs Markgraf at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇧🇷 Cafu | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 34 |
| 🇺🇸 Markgraf | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 317 | 659 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Markgraf84.7
Cafu84.6
FAQ
Where does Cafu beat Markgraf?
Cafu scores higher on dominance, longevity. Markgraf leads on peak, honours, statistics.
How is the Cafu vs Markgraf score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Cafu: 84.6, Markgraf: 84.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Cafu vs Markgraf. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.