Who is better, Clark or Johnson?
Skinny Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 72.1 against 69.6 for Caitlin Clark — a gap of 2.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Skinny Johnson above Caitlin Clark: 72.1 vs 69.6. Skinny Johnson leads on Longevity, Honours. Caitlin Clark leads on Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Johnson wins: Longevity, Honours
Clark wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/caitlin-clark-vs-skinny-johnson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Johnson leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Johnson — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | ClarkActive | JohnsonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| NCAA career points | 3,951 | — |
| Rookie of the Year | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 2 | — |
| Rookie season assists | 337 | — |
| Three-pointers (rookie record) | 122 | — |
| Seasons played | 2 | — |
| National championships | — | 1 |
| All-American selections | — | 1 |
| Hall of Fame induction | — | 1,977 |
| Big Six titles | — | 2 |
| College seasons | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 72 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 40 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 70 |
Skinny Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 72.1 against 69.6 for Caitlin Clark — a gap of 2.5 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Clark scores higher on dominance, statistics. Johnson leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Clark: 69.6, Johnson: 72.1.
Make your case for Clark vs Johnson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.