Who is better, Baldwin or Holm?
Caleb Baldwin leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.7 for Holly Holm — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Baldwin vs Holm
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Caleb Baldwin and Holly Holm level at 84.7. Caleb Baldwin leads on Longevity. Holly Holm leads on Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
BaldwinWinner
84.7Baldwin wins: Longevity
Holm
84.7Holm wins: Peak, Honours
Candidates
Locked to BoxingShareable URL · /compare/caleb-baldwin-vs-holly-holm
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇬🇧 Caleb Baldwin
84.7
Baldwin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Caleb Baldwin
2. Holly Holm
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Holly Holm5 years played · career day 1,825298 title wins
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇬🇧 Caleb Baldwin5 years played · career day 1,825265 title wins
-11.1% vs Holm at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇬🇧 Baldwin | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 265 | 549 |
| 🇺🇸 Holm | 0 | 0 | 45 | 97 | 298 | 645 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Baldwin84.7
Holm84.7
FAQ
Where does Holm beat Baldwin?
Holm scores higher on peak, honours. Baldwin leads on longevity.
How is the Baldwin vs Holm score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Baldwin: 84.7, Holm: 84.7.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Baldwin vs Holm. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.