Who is better, Johnson or Stephenson?
Calvin Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.3 for Dwight Stephenson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Calvin Johnson above Dwight Stephenson: 82.4 vs 82.3. Calvin Johnson leads on Longevity, Statistics. Dwight Stephenson leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Johnson wins: Longevity, Statistics
Stephenson wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/calvin-johnson-vs-dwight-stephenson
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Johnson leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 756 | 2,087 | 5,872 | 11,619 |
| 🇺🇸 Stephenson | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 28 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JohnsonRetired | StephensonRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Single-season receiving yards | 1,964 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 6 | 5 |
| All-Pro First Teams | 3 | — |
| Receiving yards | 11,619 | — |
| Receiving touchdowns | 83 | — |
| 1,000-yard seasons | 6 | — |
| First-team All-Pro selections | — | 4 |
| Games played | — | 114 |
| Seasons played | — | 8 |
| All-Decade team selections | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 62 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Calvin Johnson leads with a GOAT score of 82.4 against 82.3 for Dwight Stephenson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Stephenson scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Johnson leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 82.4, Stephenson: 82.3.
Make your case for Johnson vs Stephenson. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.