Who is better, Johnson or Flaherty?
Ray Flaherty leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.4 for Calvin Johnson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Ray Flaherty above Calvin Johnson: 82.5 vs 82.4. Ray Flaherty leads on Honours, Longevity. Calvin Johnson leads on Peak, Statistics, Dominance.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Flaherty wins: Longevity, Honours
Johnson wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/calvin-johnson-vs-ray-flaherty
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Flaherty leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Johnson | 0 | 0 | 756 | 2,087 | 5,872 | 11,619 |
| 🇺🇸 Flaherty | 0 | 0 | 50 | 109 | 338 | 634 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | JohnsonRetired | FlahertyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Single-season receiving yards | 1,964 | — |
| Pro Bowls | 6 | — |
| All-Pro First Teams | 3 | — |
| Receiving yards | 11,619 | — |
| Receiving touchdowns | 83 | — |
| 1,000-yard seasons | 6 | — |
| NFL titles | — | 1 |
| Receiving titles | — | 1 |
| All-Pro selections | — | 2 |
| Career receptions | — | 108 |
| Seasons played | — | 9 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 72 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 86 |
Ray Flaherty leads with a GOAT score of 82.5 against 82.4 for Calvin Johnson — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Johnson scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. Flaherty leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Johnson: 82.4, Flaherty: 82.5.
Make your case for Johnson vs Flaherty. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.