Who is better, Parker or Mullin?
Chris Mullin leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.0 for Candace Parker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chris Mullin above Candace Parker: 85.1 vs 85.0. Chris Mullin leads on Statistics, Peak. Candace Parker leads on Dominance, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Mullin wins: Peak, Statistics
Parker wins: Dominance, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/candace-parker-vs-chris-mullin
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Mullin leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Parker | 0 | 0 | 18.5 | 31.6 | 69.6 | 153.7 |
| 🇺🇸 Mullin | 0 | 0 | 45 | 98 | 308 | 662 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | ParkerRetired | MullinRetired |
|---|---|---|
| WNBA titles | 3 | — |
| WNBA MVP awards | 2 | — |
| Finals MVP | 1 | — |
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| All-Star selections | 7 | 5 |
| Defensive Player of the Year | 1 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 2 |
| Career points | — | 17,911 |
| All-NBA selections | — | 4 |
| Free-throw percentage | — | 86 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 80 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Chris Mullin leads with a GOAT score of 85.1 against 85.0 for Candace Parker — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Parker scores higher on dominance, longevity. Mullin leads on peak, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Parker: 85.0, Mullin: 85.1.
Make your case for Parker vs Mullin. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.