Who is better, Canyon or Happy?
Kim "Canyon" Geon-bu leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Vincent "Happy" Cervoni — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Kim "Canyon" Geon-bu and Vincent "Happy" Cervoni level at 85.5. Kim "Canyon" Geon-bu leads on Dominance, Statistics. Vincent "Happy" Cervoni leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Canyon wins: Dominance, Statistics
Happy wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/canyon-lol-vs-happy-cs
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Canyon leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇰🇷 Canyon | 0 | 0 | 74 | 170 | 434 | 604 |
| 🇫🇷 Happy | 0 | 0 | 58 | 128 | 318 | 658 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CanyonActive | HappyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Championship titles | 1 | — |
| World finals MVP awards | 1 | — |
| LCK titles | 4 | — |
| Mid-Season Invitational finals | 1 | — |
| World finals | 2 | — |
| Major titles | — | 2 |
| Major MVP awards | — | 2 |
| Major finals | — | 2 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 3 |
| Professional seasons | — | 10 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 86 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 84 |
Kim "Canyon" Geon-bu leads with a GOAT score of 85.5 against 85.5 for Vincent "Happy" Cervoni — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Happy scores higher on honours, longevity. Canyon leads on dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Canyon: 85.5, Happy: 85.5.
Make your case for Canyon vs Happy. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.