Who is better, Caps or blameF?
Benjamin "blameF" Bremer leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Rasmus "Caps" Winther — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Benjamin "blameF" Bremer above Rasmus "Caps" Winther: 87.6 vs 87.5. Benjamin "blameF" Bremer leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Rasmus "Caps" Winther leads on Honours, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →blameF wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Caps wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/caps-lol-vs-es-blamef
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
blameF leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇩🇰 Caps | 0 | 0 | 66 | 144 | 328 | 764 |
| 🇩🇰 blameF | 0 | 0 | 55 | 120 | 282 | 735 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CapsActive | blameFActive |
|---|---|---|
| Mid-Season Invitational titles | 1 | — |
| LEC titles | 10 | — |
| World finals | 1 | — |
| World Championship appearances | 8 | — |
| Professional seasons | 10 | — |
| Big tournament titles | — | 7 |
| HLTV top-20 placements | — | 5 |
| Tournament MVP awards | — | 4 |
| Seasons played | — | 10 |
| Career rating above 1.15 seasons | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 86 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 94 |
Benjamin "blameF" Bremer leads with a GOAT score of 87.6 against 87.5 for Rasmus "Caps" Winther — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Caps scores higher on honours, longevity. blameF leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Caps: 87.5, blameF: 87.6.
Make your case for Caps vs blameF. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.