Who is better, Hubbell or Bancroft?
Carl Hubbell leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.6 for Dave Bancroft — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Carl Hubbell above Dave Bancroft: 84.7 vs 84.6. Carl Hubbell leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Dave Bancroft leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hubbell wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Bancroft wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/carl-hubbell-vs-dave-bancroft
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hubbell leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Hubbell | 0 | 0 | 50 | 107 | 240 | 677 |
| 🇺🇸 Bancroft | 0 | 0 | 0.254 | 0.466 | 1.246 | 2.488 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | HubbellRetired | BancroftRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Career wins | 253 | — |
| MVP awards | 2 | — |
| World Series titles | 1 | 2 |
| Consecutive wins in 1936-37 | 24 | — |
| All-Star selections | 9 | — |
| Career hits | — | 2,004 |
| Career batting average | — | 0.279 |
| Seasons played | — | 16 |
| Hall of Fame inductions | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 90 |
Carl Hubbell leads with a GOAT score of 84.7 against 84.6 for Dave Bancroft — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Bancroft scores higher on statistics, longevity. Hubbell leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Hubbell: 84.7, Bancroft: 84.6.
Make your case for Hubbell vs Bancroft. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.