Who is better, Yastrzemski or Fingers?
Carl Yastrzemski leads with a GOAT score of 87.4 against 87.3 for Rollie Fingers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Carl Yastrzemski above Rollie Fingers: 87.4 vs 87.3. Carl Yastrzemski leads on Longevity, Statistics. Rollie Fingers leads on Dominance, Honours, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Yastrzemski wins: Longevity, Statistics
Fingers wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/carl-yastrzemski-vs-rollie-fingers
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Yastrzemski leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Yastrzemski | 0 | 0 | 0.266 | 0.562 | 1.484 | 2.644 |
| 🇺🇸 Fingers | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 124 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | YastrzemskiRetired | FingersRetired |
|---|---|---|
| League MVP awards | 1 | — |
| Triple Crowns | 1 | — |
| Career hits | 3,419 | — |
| Home runs | 452 | — |
| All-Star selections | 18 | 7 |
| Career saves | — | 341 |
| World Series titles | — | 3 |
| Cy Young Awards | — | 1 |
| MVP awards | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 94 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 92 | 90 |
Carl Yastrzemski leads with a GOAT score of 87.4 against 87.3 for Rollie Fingers — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Fingers scores higher on peak, dominance, honours. Yastrzemski leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Yastrzemski: 87.4, Fingers: 87.3.
Make your case for Yastrzemski vs Fingers. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.