Who is better, Bianchi or Oblak?
Carlos Bianchi leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Jan Oblak — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Carlos Bianchi and Jan Oblak level at 85.2. Carlos Bianchi leads on Honours, Statistics. Jan Oblak leads on Dominance, Peak, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Bianchi wins: Honours, Statistics
Oblak wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/carlos-bianchi-vs-jan-oblak
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Bianchi leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇷 Bianchi | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 48 | 176 |
| 🇸🇮 Oblak | 0 | 0 | 0 | 56 | 260 | 608 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BianchiRetired | OblakActive |
|---|---|---|
| Ligue 1 top scorer awards | 4 | — |
| Career goals | 430 | — |
| Ligue 1 goals | 179 | — |
| Copa Libertadores titles as coach | 4 | — |
| Intercontinental Cups as coach | 3 | — |
| Zamora Trophies | — | 5 |
| La Liga titles | — | 1 |
| Europa League titles | — | 1 |
| Slovenia caps | — | 69 |
| Appearances for Atlético de Madrid | — | 480 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 82 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Carlos Bianchi leads with a GOAT score of 85.2 against 85.2 for Jan Oblak — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Oblak scores higher on peak, dominance, longevity. Bianchi leads on honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Bianchi: 85.2, Oblak: 85.2.
Make your case for Bianchi vs Oblak. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.