Who is better, Anthony or Vučević?
Carmelo Anthony leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.2 for Nikola Vučević — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Carmelo Anthony and Nikola Vučević level at 80.2. Carmelo Anthony leads on Longevity, Honours. Nikola Vučević leads on Dominance, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Anthony wins: Longevity, Honours
Vučević wins: Dominance, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/carmelo-anthony-vs-nikola-vucevic
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Anthony leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Anthony | 0 | 0 | 21 | 41.8 | 122.9 | 222.1 |
| 🇲🇪 Vučević | 0 | 0 | 5.5 | 18.6 | 70.3 | 141.8 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | AnthonyRetired | VučevićActive · Orlando Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 3 | — |
| Scoring titles | 1 | — |
| All-Star selections | 10 | — |
| Career points | 28,289 | 17,000 |
| Career points per game | 22.5 | — |
| NBA All-Star selections | — | 2 |
| Career rebounds | — | 9,000 |
| Career double-doubles | — | 400 |
| NBA seasons | — | 14 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 84 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 74 | 72 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 88 |
Carmelo Anthony leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.2 for Nikola Vučević — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Vučević scores higher on dominance, statistics. Anthony leads on honours, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Anthony: 80.2, Vučević: 80.2.
Make your case for Anthony vs Vučević. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.