Who is better, Blazejowski or McGuire?
Carol Blazejowski leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.3 for Dick McGuire — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Carol Blazejowski and Dick McGuire level at 80.3. Carol Blazejowski leads on Dominance, Peak, Statistics. Dick McGuire leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Blazejowski wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
McGuire wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/carol-blazejowski-vs-dick-mcguire
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Blazejowski leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Blazejowski | 0 | 0 | 60 | 129 | 390 | 672 |
| 🇺🇸 McGuire | 0 | 0 | 5.7 | 12 | 29.9 | 51.2 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BlazejowskiRetired | McGuireRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Wade Trophy awards | 1 | — |
| College points per game | 31.7 | — |
| National team titles | 1 | — |
| College career points | 3,199 | — |
| Seasons played | 9 | 11 |
| All-Star selections | — | 7 |
| Career assists | — | 4,205 |
| Games played | — | 738 |
| Career assists per game | — | 5.7 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 74 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 64 | 82 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 84 |
Carol Blazejowski leads with a GOAT score of 80.3 against 80.3 for Dick McGuire — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McGuire scores higher on longevity. Blazejowski leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Blazejowski: 80.3, McGuire: 80.3.
Make your case for Blazejowski vs McGuire. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.