Who is better, Burckle or Hoff?
Katie Hoff leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Caroline Burckle — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Katie Hoff above Caroline Burckle: 78.2 vs 78.1. Katie Hoff leads on Longevity. Caroline Burckle leads on Peak, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hoff wins: Longevity
Burckle wins: Peak, Honours, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/caroline-burckle-vs-katie-hoff
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hoff leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Burckle | 0 | 0 | 50 | 115 | 348 | 348 |
| 🇺🇸 Hoff | 0 | 0 | 58 | 134 | 306 | 684 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | BurckleRetired | HoffRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 3 |
| NCAA titles | 2 | — |
| US national medals | 3 | — |
| NCAA Swimmer of the Year awards | 1 | — |
| Personal best in the 500 free | 27,112 | — |
| World Championship golds | — | 5 |
| World records set | — | 2 |
| US national titles | — | 20 |
| Olympic Games contested | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 76 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 66 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Katie Hoff leads with a GOAT score of 78.2 against 78.1 for Caroline Burckle — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Burckle scores higher on peak, honours, statistics. Hoff leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Burckle: 78.1, Hoff: 78.2.
Make your case for Burckle vs Hoff. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.