Who is better, Graham Hansen or Zola?
Caroline Graham Hansen leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Gianfranco Zola — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Caroline Graham Hansen and Gianfranco Zola level at 83.1. Caroline Graham Hansen leads on Dominance, Honours. Gianfranco Zola leads on Longevity, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Graham Hansen wins: Dominance, Honours
Zola wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/caroline-graham-hansen-vs-gianfranco-zola
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Graham Hansen leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇳🇴 Graham Hansen | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 74 |
| 🇮🇹 Zola | 0 | 0 | 45 | 94 | 205 | 555 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | Graham HansenActive | ZolaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 3 | — |
| Liga F titles | 5 | — |
| Bundesliga titles | 2 | — |
| Norway caps | 100 | — |
| Barcelona goals | 90 | — |
| Cup Winners' Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Serie A titles | — | 1 |
| UEFA Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Career goals | — | 193 |
| Italy caps | — | 35 |
| Dominance w25% | 82 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 86 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 86 |
Caroline Graham Hansen leads with a GOAT score of 83.1 against 83.1 for Gianfranco Zola — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Zola scores higher on peak, statistics, longevity. Graham Hansen leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Graham Hansen: 83.1, Zola: 83.1.
Make your case for Graham Hansen vs Zola. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.