Who is better, Ouellette or Jágr?
Caroline Ouellette leads with a GOAT score of 91.8 against 91.6 for Jaromír Jágr — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Caroline Ouellette above Jaromír Jágr: 91.8 vs 91.6. Caroline Ouellette leads on Honours, Peak, Dominance. Jaromír Jágr leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ouellette wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Jágr wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/caroline-ouellette-vs-jagr
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ouellette leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Ouellette | 0 | 0 | 60 | 125 | 347 | 707 |
| 🇨🇿 Jágr | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 126 | 595 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OuelletteRetired | JágrRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 4 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | 6 | — |
| World Championship medals | 12 | — |
| International points | 242 | — |
| Clarkson Cups | 4 | — |
| NHL points | — | 1,921 |
| Art Ross Trophies | — | 5 |
| Stanley Cups | — | 2 |
| Hart Trophies | — | 1 |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| NHL goals | — | 766 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 91 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 99 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 93 |
Caroline Ouellette leads with a GOAT score of 91.8 against 91.6 for Jaromír Jágr — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Jágr scores higher on statistics, longevity. Ouellette leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ouellette: 91.8, Jágr: 91.6.
Make your case for Ouellette vs Jágr. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.