Who is better, Ouellette or Hefford?
Jayna Hefford leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 91.8 for Caroline Ouellette — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Jayna Hefford above Caroline Ouellette: 91.9 vs 91.8. Jayna Hefford leads on Longevity, Statistics. Caroline Ouellette leads on Peak, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Hefford wins: Longevity, Statistics
Ouellette wins: Peak, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/caroline-ouellette-vs-jayna-hefford
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Hefford leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Ouellette | 0 | 0 | 60 | 125 | 347 | 707 |
| 🇨🇦 Hefford | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 77 | 170 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OuelletteRetired | HeffordRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 4 | — |
| World Championship gold medals | 6 | — |
| World Championship medals | 12 | — |
| International points | 242 | — |
| Clarkson Cups | 4 | — |
| Olympic golds | — | 4 |
| Olympic medals | — | 5 |
| World Championship golds | — | 7 |
| Canada caps | — | 267 |
| Canada career goals | — | 157 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 94 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 92 |
Jayna Hefford leads with a GOAT score of 91.9 against 91.8 for Caroline Ouellette — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ouellette scores higher on peak, honours. Hefford leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ouellette: 91.8, Hefford: 91.9.
Make your case for Ouellette vs Hefford. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.