Who is better, Ouellette or Fetisov?
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 91.8 for Caroline Ouellette — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Viacheslav Fetisov above Caroline Ouellette: 92.1 vs 91.8. Viacheslav Fetisov leads on Longevity. Caroline Ouellette leads on Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fetisov wins: Longevity
Ouellette wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/caroline-ouellette-vs-viacheslav-fetisov
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fetisov leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇨🇦 Ouellette | 0 | 0 | 60 | 125 | 347 | 707 |
| 🇷🇺 Fetisov | 0 | 0 | 50 | 105 | 297 | 620 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | OuelletteRetired | FetisovRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic gold medals | 4 | 2 |
| World Championship gold medals | 6 | — |
| World Championship medals | 12 | — |
| International points | 242 | — |
| Clarkson Cups | 4 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 7 |
| Stanley Cups | — | 2 |
| Soviet league titles | — | 13 |
| Golden Stick awards | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 90 | 90 |
| Peak w20% | 95 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Honours w20% | 96 | 96 |
| Statistics w15% | 90 | 88 |
Viacheslav Fetisov leads with a GOAT score of 92.1 against 91.8 for Caroline Ouellette — a gap of 0.3 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Ouellette scores higher on peak, statistics. Fetisov leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ouellette: 91.8, Fetisov: 92.1.
Make your case for Ouellette vs Fetisov. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.