Who is better, Seger or van de Beek?
Donny van de Beek leads with a GOAT score of 69.7 against 66.7 for Caroline Seger — a gap of 3.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Donny van de Beek above Caroline Seger: 69.7 vs 66.7. Donny van de Beek leads on Peak, Honours, Dominance. Caroline Seger leads on Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →van de Beek wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours, Statistics
Seger wins: Longevity
Shareable URL · /compare/caroline-seger-vs-donny-van-de-beek
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
van de Beek leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
van de Beek is -14.3% behind Seger's pace at age 21
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | SegerRetired | van de BeekRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden caps | 240 | — |
| Olympic silver | 2 | — |
| World Cup bronze | 2 | — |
| Diamantbollen awards | 2 | — |
| League titles | 6 | — |
| Seasons as captain | 12 | — |
| Career league goals | — | 32 |
| Netherlands caps | — | 19 |
| Eredivisie titles | — | 1 |
| Champions League semi-finalist | — | 1 |
| Ballon d'Or nominee | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 64 | 68 |
| Peak w20% | 64 | 78 |
| Longevity w20% | 78 | 65 |
| Honours w20% | 62 | 68 |
| Statistics w15% | 66 | 70 |
Donny van de Beek leads with a GOAT score of 69.7 against 66.7 for Caroline Seger — a gap of 3.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Seger scores higher on longevity. van de Beek leads on peak, dominance, honours, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Seger: 66.7, van de Beek: 69.7.
Make your case for Seger vs van de Beek. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.