GGOATRANK
AthletesTeams

Wozniacki vs Mauresmo

Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.

GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
WozniackiWinner
76.1

Wozniacki wins: Dominance, Statistics

Mauresmo
75.7

Mauresmo wins: Honours

Candidates
Locked to Tennis

Shareable URL · /compare/caroline-wozniacki-vs-amelie-mauresmo

Time range

Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.

Category radar

Verdict

Weighted GOAT score
🇩🇰 Caroline Wozniacki
76.1

Wozniacki leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories. 71 weeks at world No. 1, crowned by the 2018 Australian Open.

1. Caroline Wozniacki
76.1
2. Amélie Mauresmo
75.7

Category breakdown

Season form · Titles per season

Career timeline · Titles per season

Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.

GOAT pace tracker

Career stage · GOAT pace

Through season 5 · Titles per season
1. 🇩🇰 Caroline Wozniacki5 seasons played · career day 2,92117 titles
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇫🇷 Amélie Mauresmo5 seasons played · career day 3,6519 titles
-47.1% vs Wozniacki at the same stage
Ghost race · career day30100365100018253650
🇩🇰 Wozniacki0000419
🇫🇷 Mauresmo000006

Careers are aligned at debut, so a rookie's first 5 seasons are measured against the same window in a legend's career — Yamal against Messi at the same age-stage, a tour rookie against Tiger Woods in 1996.

MetricWozniackiActiveMauresmoRetired
Grand Slam titles12
Weeks at No. 17139
Career singles titles30
WTA Finals titles1
Career match wins620
Career titles25
Olympic medals1
Tour Finals titles1
Fed Cups1
Dominance w25%7270
Peak w20%8282
Longevity w20%7878
Honours w20%7274
Statistics w15%7876

Fan vote — data vs the people

GOAT Rank · the data
Wozniacki76.1
Mauresmo75.7
The people
Wozniacki
Mauresmo

Loading votes

Create a free account to vote and comment.

Sign in to vote

What do you think?

0 comments

Make your case for Wozniacki vs Mauresmo. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.

More debates

Browse the rivalry hub →