Who is better, Casemiro or Marta?
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 88.3 for Casemiro — a gap of 6.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Marta Vieira da Silva above Casemiro: 95.0 vs 88.3. Marta Vieira da Silva leads on Dominance, Statistics, Longevity. Casemiro leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Marta wins: Dominance, Peak, Longevity, Statistics
Casemiro wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/casemiro-f-vs-marta
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Marta leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Casemiro — Insufficient verified career data to calculate a reliable GOAT Score.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
Setting the pace at age 21
No verified birth date for Casemiro — shown in the pro-debut view instead.
Every career is cut at the season the athlete turned 21, so a rookie today is measured against exactly what a legend had banked by the same birthday.
| Metric | CasemiroActive | MartaActive |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 5 | — |
| La Liga titles | 3 | — |
| Club World Cup titles | 3 | — |
| Copa América titles | 1 | — |
| Brazil caps | 76 | 200 |
| FIFA World Player awards | — | 6 |
| World Cup goals | — | 17 |
| Brazil goals | — | 119 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World Cups played | — | 6 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 96 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 97 |
| Longevity w20% | 86 | 94 |
| Honours w20% | 94 | 92 |
| Statistics w15% | 86 | 96 |
Marta Vieira da Silva leads with a GOAT score of 95.0 against 88.3 for Casemiro — a gap of 6.7 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Casemiro scores higher on honours. Marta leads on peak, dominance, statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Casemiro: 88.3, Marta: 95.0.
Make your case for Casemiro vs Marta. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.