Who is better, Casillas or Nordahl?
Gunnar Nordahl leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Iker Casillas — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Gunnar Nordahl above Iker Casillas: 86.6 vs 86.5. Gunnar Nordahl leads on Statistics, Dominance, Peak. Iker Casillas leads on Longevity, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Nordahl wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Casillas wins: Longevity, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/casillas-vs-gunnar-nordahl
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Nordahl leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇪🇸 Casillas | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 57 | 131 |
| 🇸🇪 Nordahl | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 45 | 208 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CasillasRetired | NordahlRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Champions League titles | 3 | — |
| World Cups | 1 | — |
| European Championships | 2 | — |
| La Liga titles | 5 | — |
| Spain caps | 167 | — |
| Zamora Trophies | 5 | — |
| Serie A top scorer awards | — | 5 |
| Serie A goals | — | 225 |
| Olympic golds | — | 1 |
| Sweden goals | — | 43 |
| Career goals | — | 456 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 92 |
Gunnar Nordahl leads with a GOAT score of 86.6 against 86.5 for Iker Casillas — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Casillas scores higher on honours, longevity. Nordahl leads on peak, dominance, statistics.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Casillas: 86.5, Nordahl: 86.6.
Make your case for Casillas vs Nordahl. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.