Who is better, Semenya or Astapkovich?
Igor Astapkovich leads with a GOAT score of 87.3 against 87.2 for Caster Semenya — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Igor Astapkovich above Caster Semenya: 87.3 vs 87.2. Igor Astapkovich leads on Longevity, Statistics. Caster Semenya leads on Dominance, Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Astapkovich wins: Longevity, Statistics
Semenya wins: Dominance, Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/caster-semenya-vs-igor-astapkovich
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Astapkovich leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Semenya | 0 | 0 | 0 | 115.45 | 350.87 | 941.46 |
| 🇧🇾 Astapkovich | 0 | 0 | 45 | 100 | 327 | 679 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SemenyaActive | AstapkovichRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 3 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 1 | — |
| 800m best (sec) | 114.25 | — |
| Consecutive 800m wins | 30 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| Personal best in centimetres | — | 8,462 |
| European Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World Championship medals | — | 4 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 84 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Igor Astapkovich leads with a GOAT score of 87.3 against 87.2 for Caster Semenya — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Semenya scores higher on dominance, honours. Astapkovich leads on statistics, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Semenya: 87.2, Astapkovich: 87.3.
Make your case for Semenya vs Astapkovich. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.