Who is better, Semenya or Backley?
Caster Semenya leads with a GOAT score of 87.2 against 87.2 for Steve Backley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Caster Semenya and Steve Backley level at 87.2. Caster Semenya leads on Dominance, Honours. Steve Backley leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Semenya wins: Dominance, Honours
Backley wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/caster-semenya-vs-steve-backley
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Semenya leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 Semenya | 0 | 0 | 0 | 115.45 | 350.87 | 941.46 |
| 🇬🇧 Backley | 0 | 0 | 0 | 85.9 | 268.34 | 702.18 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SemenyaActive | BackleyRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 2 | — |
| World Championship golds | 3 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 1 | — |
| 800m best (sec) | 114.25 | — |
| Consecutive 800m wins | 30 | — |
| European titles | — | 3 |
| Olympic medals | — | 3 |
| World records | — | 2 |
| Javelin best | — | 91.46 |
| Commonwealth titles | — | 3 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 92 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 88 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 86 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 90 |
Caster Semenya leads with a GOAT score of 87.2 against 87.2 for Steve Backley — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Backley scores higher on statistics, longevity. Semenya leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Semenya: 87.2, Backley: 87.2.
Make your case for Semenya vs Backley. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.