Who is better, Campbell or McKeon?
Cate Campbell leads with a GOAT score of 90.1 against 87.0 for Emma McKeon — a gap of 3.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cate Campbell above Emma McKeon: 90.1 vs 87.0. Cate Campbell leads on Longevity, Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Campbell wins: Peak, Longevity, Statistics
McKeon wins: no category outright
Shareable URL · /compare/cate-campbell-vs-emma-mckeon
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Campbell leads in 5 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Campbell | 0 | 0 | 53.8 | 107.4 | 214 | 476.3 |
| 🇦🇺 McKeon | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 34 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Cate Campbell leads with a GOAT score of 90.1 against 87.0 for Emma McKeon — a gap of 3.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
McKeon does not lead any of the five categories; Campbell is ahead or level on all of them.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Campbell: 90.1, McKeon: 87.0.
Make your case for Campbell vs McKeon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.