Who is better, Fitzpatrick or Hayden?
Cathryn Fitzpatrick leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 90.4 for Matthew Hayden — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cathryn Fitzpatrick above Matthew Hayden: 90.5 vs 90.4. Cathryn Fitzpatrick leads on Longevity. Matthew Hayden leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Fitzpatrick wins: Longevity
Hayden wins: Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/cathryn-fitzpatrick-vs-matthew-hayden
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Fitzpatrick leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Fitzpatrick | 0 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 74 | 151 |
| 🇦🇺 Hayden | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 219 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FitzpatrickRetired | HaydenRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 2 | 2 |
| ODI wickets | 180 | — |
| ODI bowling average | 16.79 | — |
| Test wickets | 60 | — |
| ODI matches | 109 | — |
| Test runs | — | 8,625 |
| Test centuries | — | 30 |
| Highest Test score | — | 380 |
| Test average | — | 50.73 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 96 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 90 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 96 |
Cathryn Fitzpatrick leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 90.4 for Matthew Hayden — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hayden scores higher on peak, statistics. Fitzpatrick leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fitzpatrick: 90.5, Hayden: 90.4.
Make your case for Fitzpatrick vs Hayden. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.