Who is better, Fitzpatrick or Sehwag?
Cathryn Fitzpatrick leads with a GOAT score of 90.5 against 90.4 for Virender Sehwag — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Fitzpatrick vs Sehwag
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Cathryn Fitzpatrick above Virender Sehwag: 90.5 vs 90.4. Cathryn Fitzpatrick leads on Longevity, Honours. Virender Sehwag leads on Peak, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
FitzpatrickWinner
90.5Fitzpatrick wins: Longevity, Honours
Sehwag
90.4Sehwag wins: Peak, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to CricketShareable URL · /compare/cathryn-fitzpatrick-vs-virender-sehwag
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇦🇺 Cathryn Fitzpatrick
90.5
Fitzpatrick leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Cathryn Fitzpatrick
2. Virender Sehwag
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through year 5 · Form index per season1. 🇮🇳 Virender Sehwag5 years played · career day 3,286264 runs
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇦🇺 Cathryn Fitzpatrick5 years played · career day 1,82574 runs
-72.0% vs Sehwag at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Fitzpatrick | 0 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 74 | 151 |
| 🇮🇳 Sehwag | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 264 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FitzpatrickRetired | SehwagRetired |
|---|---|---|
| World Cup titles | 2 | 1 |
| ODI wickets | 180 | — |
| ODI bowling average | 16.79 | — |
| Test wickets | 60 | — |
| ODI matches | 109 | — |
| Test runs | — | 8,586 |
| Test triple centuries | — | 2 |
| Highest Test score | — | 319 |
| Test strike rate | — | 82.23 |
| Dominance w25% | 88 | 88 |
| Peak w20% | 94 | 98 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 84 |
| Honours w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 94 | 96 |
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Fitzpatrick90.5
Sehwag90.4
FAQ
Where does Sehwag beat Fitzpatrick?
Sehwag scores higher on peak, statistics. Fitzpatrick leads on honours, longevity.
How is the Fitzpatrick vs Sehwag score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Fitzpatrick: 90.5, Sehwag: 90.4.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Fitzpatrick vs Sehwag. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.