Who is better, Freeman or Kipsang?
Wilson Kipsang leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Cathy Freeman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Wilson Kipsang above Cathy Freeman: 82.7 vs 82.6. Wilson Kipsang leads on Dominance. Cathy Freeman leads on Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Kipsang wins: Dominance
Freeman wins: Peak
Shareable URL · /compare/cathy-freeman-vs-wilson-kipsang
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Kipsang leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇦🇺 Freeman | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 26 |
| 🇰🇪 Kipsang | 0 | 0 | 76 | 162 | 436 | 762 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | FreemanRetired | KipsangRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| World Championship golds | 2 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 3 | — |
| 400m best (sec) | 48.63 | — |
| Olympic medals | 2 | — |
| World record marathon | — | 2.032 |
| World Marathon Majors wins | — | 4 |
| Olympic bronze medals | — | 1 |
| Sub 2:04 marathons | — | 4 |
| London Marathon wins | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 82 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 90 |
| Longevity w20% | 76 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 82 | 82 |
| Statistics w15% | 84 | 84 |
Wilson Kipsang leads with a GOAT score of 82.7 against 82.6 for Cathy Freeman — a gap of 0.1 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Freeman scores higher on peak. Kipsang leads on dominance.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Freeman: 82.6, Kipsang: 82.7.
Make your case for Freeman vs Kipsang. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.