Who is better, Ceb or floppy?
Ceb leads with a GOAT score of 79.8 against 79.8 for Ricky "floppy" Kemery — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Ceb and Ricky "floppy" Kemery level at 79.8. Ceb leads on Honours, Dominance. Ricky "floppy" Kemery leads on Statistics, Longevity.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Ceb wins: Dominance, Honours
floppy wins: Longevity, Statistics
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Ceb leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇫🇷 Ceb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 19 |
| 🇺🇸 floppy | 0 | 0 | 50 | 108 | 332 | 674 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 split year periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | CebActive | floppyActive |
|---|---|---|
| The International titles | 2 | — |
| Major titles | 1 | — |
| Career prize money (USD) | 6,500,000 | — |
| Premier tournament wins | 6 | — |
| TI appearances | 6 | — |
| Big tournament titles | — | 3 |
| Major appearances | — | 6 |
| Seasons played | — | 8 |
| Career maps played | — | 1,300 |
| Tournament finals | — | 5 |
| Dominance w25% | 80 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 70 | 76 |
| Honours w20% | 84 | 74 |
| Statistics w15% | 76 | 88 |
Ceb leads with a GOAT score of 79.8 against 79.8 for Ricky "floppy" Kemery — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
floppy scores higher on statistics, longevity. Ceb leads on dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Ceb: 79.8, floppy: 79.8.
Make your case for Ceb vs floppy. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.