Who is better, Tait or Hill?
Cecilia Tait leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Kimberly Hill — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Cecilia Tait and Kimberly Hill level at 81.5. Cecilia Tait leads on Peak, Longevity. Kimberly Hill leads on Honours.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Tait wins: Peak, Longevity
Hill wins: Honours
Shareable URL · /compare/cecilia-tait-vs-kimberly-hill
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Tait leads in 4 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇵🇪 Tait | 0 | 0 | 55 | 119 | 357 | 721 |
| 🇺🇸 Hill | 0 | 0 | 52 | 116 | 280 | 732 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | TaitRetired | HillActive |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic medals | 1 | 2 |
| World Championship medals | 1 | — |
| South American titles | 4 | — |
| Best spiker awards | 1 | — |
| Olympic Games contested | 3 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 1 |
| World Championship titles | — | 1 |
| World Cup titles | — | 1 |
| Nations League titles | — | 2 |
| Dominance w25% | 78 | 78 |
| Peak w20% | 90 | 88 |
| Longevity w20% | 80 | 78 |
| Honours w20% | 80 | 84 |
| Statistics w15% | 80 | 80 |
Cecilia Tait leads with a GOAT score of 81.5 against 81.5 for Kimberly Hill — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Hill scores higher on honours. Tait leads on peak, longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Tait: 81.5, Hill: 81.5.
Make your case for Tait vs Hill. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.