Who is better, Carvin or Bacon?
Chad Carvin leads with a GOAT score of 76.9 against 76.9 for Phoebe Bacon — a gap of 0.0 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
AthletesTeams
Carvin vs Bacon
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently scores Chad Carvin and Phoebe Bacon level at 76.9. Chad Carvin leads on Longevity. Phoebe Bacon leads on Dominance, Honours, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →GOAT verdictgoatrank.world
CarvinWinner
76.9Carvin wins: Longevity
Bacon
76.9Bacon wins: Dominance, Honours, Statistics
Candidates
Locked to SwimmingShareable URL · /compare/chad-carvin-vs-phoebe-bacon
Time range
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Category radar
Verdict
Weighted GOAT score
🇺🇸 Chad Carvin
76.9
Carvin leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
1. Chad Carvin
2. Phoebe Bacon
Category breakdown
Season form · Form index per season
Career timeline · Form index per season
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
GOAT pace tracker
Career stage · GOAT pace
Through season 5 · Form index per season1. 🇺🇸 Chad Carvin5 seasons played · career day 2,19018 major golds
Setting the pace at this stage
2. 🇺🇸 Phoebe Bacon5 seasons played · career day 1,82518 major golds
0.0% vs Carvin at the same stage
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Carvin | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 28 |
| 🇺🇸 Bacon | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 18 | 27 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
Fan vote — data vs the people
GOAT Rank · the data
Carvin76.9
Bacon76.9
FAQ
Where does Bacon beat Carvin?
Bacon scores higher on dominance, honours, statistics. Carvin leads on longevity.
How is the Carvin vs Bacon score calculated?
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Carvin: 76.9, Bacon: 76.9.
What do you think?
0 commentsMake your case for Carvin vs Bacon. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.