Who is better, le Clos or Weissmuller?
Chad le Clos leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.6 for Johnny Weissmuller — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Chad le Clos above Johnny Weissmuller: 87.8 vs 87.6. Chad le Clos leads on Longevity. Johnny Weissmuller leads on Dominance, Statistics, Peak.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →le Clos wins: Longevity
Weissmuller wins: Dominance, Peak, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/chad-le-clos-vs-johnny-weissmuller
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
le Clos leads in 2 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇿🇦 le Clos | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 228.4 | 793.7 |
| 🇺🇸 Weissmuller | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 19 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | le ClosActive | WeissmullerRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Olympic golds | 1 | — |
| Olympic medals | 4 | — |
| World short course golds | 17 | — |
| Commonwealth golds | 8 | — |
| 200m butterfly best (sec) | 112.68 | — |
| Olympic gold medals | — | 5 |
| Olympic bronze medals | — | 1 |
| World records | — | 51 |
| US national titles | — | 52 |
| Unbeaten individual races | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 84 | 92 |
| Peak w20% | 92 | 94 |
| Longevity w20% | 88 | 72 |
| Honours w20% | 88 | 88 |
| Statistics w15% | 88 | 92 |
Chad le Clos leads with a GOAT score of 87.8 against 87.6 for Johnny Weissmuller — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Weissmuller scores higher on peak, dominance, statistics. le Clos leads on longevity.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. le Clos: 87.8, Weissmuller: 87.6.
Make your case for le Clos vs Weissmuller. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.