Who is better, Schalk or Gamova?
Yekaterina Gamova leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.0 for Chaim Schalk — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Shareable comparison — send this exact matchup to anyone.
Quick answer
GOAT Rank currently ranks Yekaterina Gamova above Chaim Schalk: 80.2 vs 80.0. Yekaterina Gamova leads on Dominance, Peak, Honours. Chaim Schalk leads on Longevity, Statistics.
How the GOAT Score is calculated →Gamova wins: Dominance, Peak, Honours
Schalk wins: Longevity, Statistics
Shareable URL · /compare/chaim-schalk-bv-vs-yekaterina-gamova
Showing full careers. Pick a window to recalculate the selected period.
Gamova leads in 3 of 5 weighted categories.
Cumulative output season by season — the shape of each career against the other.
| Ghost race · career day | 30 | 100 | 365 | 1000 | 1825 | 3650 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇺🇸 Schalk | 0 | 0 | 52 | 110 | 322 | 669 |
| 🇷🇺 Gamova | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 50 |
Careers are aligned from debut; the first 5 season periods are measured against the same career window.
| Metric | SchalkActive | GamovaRetired |
|---|---|---|
| Pan American gold medals | 1 | — |
| AVP titles | 3 | — |
| World Tour medals | 4 | — |
| Olympic appearances | 2 | — |
| Seasons on tour | 15 | — |
| World Championship titles | — | 2 |
| Olympic medals | — | 2 |
| European Championship titles | — | 3 |
| Champions League titles | — | 3 |
| MVP awards | — | 4 |
| Grand Prix titles | — | 1 |
| Dominance w25% | 74 | 76 |
| Peak w20% | 84 | 86 |
| Longevity w20% | 84 | 80 |
| Honours w20% | 78 | 80 |
| Statistics w15% | 82 | 80 |
Yekaterina Gamova leads with a GOAT score of 80.2 against 80.0 for Chaim Schalk — a gap of 0.2 points on GOAT Rank's weighted model.
Schalk scores higher on statistics, longevity. Gamova leads on peak, dominance, honours.
Both are scored on peak, dominance, honours, statistics, longevity within their sport. Schalk: 80.0, Gamova: 80.2.
Make your case for Schalk vs Gamova. The scoring is published in full — if you can point at the pillar or the weight you disagree with, we read it. Read the methodology paper.